Army Men RTS Forums

Landing Craft unit, water alternative for Chinook.

Spoiler

Model and textures by Traffic_Accident, screenshots by TommyCD1.

Hello. Thank you. About Flame-Tank. Firstly there was a concept for amphibious assault vehicle, which could pass via land and water. Unforunately we have not found a way how to wisely support both terrain types. Current flamethrower vehicle would be used only on certain custom maps. It is possible ...

dmarijan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2019 5:45 am

Have not planned for singleplayer yet, so first versions of the mod would be used as multiplayer map pack.

It is not excluded, that there would be more extended version, which mods singleplayer also, but main priority is multiplayer.

Army Men RTS: Advanced Mod it is a series of multiplayer maps that looks to rebalance and enhance the gameplay experience while remaining as true to the vanilla experience as it can within reason. History of the mod begins from Unit Expansion mod . The idea was to make multiplayer mod that provides...

Magnos wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 4:40 pm

I have tested it. By the way you have forgot 'apache_rocket.wav' file.

Firing style is interesting, but the trajectory looks somewhat odd. Also I liked how you made death animation. Should test it ingame, probably I will update Apache stats with this new one.

Secg wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 3:08 am

I have tried that. It still loads default AIs, because problem is that you can not define certain personality to a playable slot. It could be done only for ambient AI.

Yes, I have played it. This map is very unique.

Interesting solution. I will try it.

Secg wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 7:22 am

Yes, that is pretty good idea. I was thinking to do it like that. But some of maps, especially large ones, have standart 70 unit limit, so I have to recompile them in that case which is not good idea by itself, because players must download recompiled maps.

Secg wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 4:26 pm

It is too bad, because in this case need to repack all maps.
Though I need only remove this limit, so I can use CommandCost(0) for that.